|  
        
          Religious Life Without Integrity 
        
       
        
          The Sexual Abuse Crisis 
          in the Catholic Church 
        
       
        
          By Barry M Coldrey 
        
      
 11: HYPOCRISY  A Cardinal Sin'The Irish are increasingly troubled by the 
        hypocrisy of their church which takes a hard-line on personal sexual matters 
        while sweeping clerical sex scandals under the rug.' Hillenbrand, B. 'When 
        Dad is a Father', Time, 21 August 1995, p. 
        70. In the modern secular Western world, hypocritical 
        living is a major evil. It is bizarre that our a religious society should 
        share so closely an important Biblical standard. Even a casual reading of the New Testament 
        dramatises that Jesus was extremely critical of the Pharisees and Sadducees, 
        the current rulers of Israel. Why was He so vehement in condemning 
        them ? It seems that they were hypocrites; they were religious leaders 
        who sought all the perks of the job but they did not live what they preached. The Pharisees lived a stark disparity between 
        their traditional ideals and their current behaviour. They exploited the 
        gullibility of the much-less-educated Hebrew masses. Christ was angered 
        by this. A similar attitude is common in contemporary 
        society: those who live within the law, or according to known principles 
        are approved; religious hypocrites are denounced, especially where sexual 
        and money matters are concerned. Everybody understands money matters and 
        sex. A humourous example might make the point 
        more starkly: one Saturday morning the author was sitting with a confrere 
        in the community room - he reading an account of 'Prostitution in Melbourne' 
        and a sympathetic pen-portrait of "Masie O'Leary" 'the nuns 
        were so strict' one of the city's more distinguished Madams. Brother fumed. 
        Here was the newspaper praising a brothel-keeper, while on the other hand, 
        any priest, Brother or church-worker who failed in the slightest way sexually 
        was attacked bitterly. Here were double standards indeed. Brother in his indignation had missed the 
        main thrust of the article. The point was not to praise Masie as a person 
        nor to endorse brothels. Prostitution was simply a fact of life and Masie 
        was managing so the paper said a well-ordered brothel according to the 
        law as it stood. The place was in a 'Red Light' area, remote 
        from churches, schools and ordinary suburban living. Her clients came 
        willingly; no one forced them. Masie made no secret of her profession, 
        one of the oldest. In those senses, she lived with integrity; she tried 
        to fool no one. On the other hand, priests or vowed members 
        of Religious Congregations abusing children is quite a different thing. 
        It is against the law. It arouses visceral hostility in parents; it 
        is the crime with zero tolerance. 'Father' or 'Brother' is a religious teacher 
        who supposedly lives the community's ideals...and better. He falls; its 
        news; he offends, the community reacts, outraged in its expectations, 
        rather than if 'Father' was merely plain 'Mr'. A priest who offends drags the church into 
        disrepute. In this sense, the secular community echoes the teachings of 
        Jesus who attacked the religious leaders of his time, but was comfortable 
        with 'ordinary decent criminals'. There are additional reasons, moreover, for 
        the candour unleashed against the clergy during the sexual abuse crisis. 
        Since World War II, the key moral issues confronting the church have been 
        sexual or possessed a sexual element: contraception, ('the pill'); abortion, 
        premarital sex, divorce and remarriage; gay rights; in-vitro fertilisation. 
        The church's teaching is austere and this writer has no problems with 
        this severe line where it is the message of Christ mediated through the 
        scriptures and a long tradition of church teaching. However, this conservative position involves 
        celibate or sexually-active 'celibate' priests and church workers laying 
        down the law to the married, the ordinary 'people of God'. Now the married 
        and the 'ordinary people of God' are having to face the painful reality 
        than many of those doing the lecturing have been living hypocritically 
        over long periods. No wonder many church-going Catholics are rattled. Catholics are being confronted with the 'secret 
        system' nakedly revealed; and the anger at being let-down by many 
        of their religious leaders can be white-hot. As an Irish 
        Times report of 1997 revealed in one celebrated case:  
        A crowd of some 200 people screamed 
          abuse and obscenities at the Norbertine priest, Father Brendan Smyth, 
          after he was released from Magilligan prison in Derry last week where 
          he was serving a four-year sentence for molesting children over a twenty-year-period 
          in West Belfast. Charges of sexual exploitation against 
        priests, Brothers and church workers have come with draining regularity. 
        Church leaders have lost credibility. If community anger and the sense 
        of betrayal are reflected in savage media reviews of clerical sin and 
        celibate shortcomings, should anyone be surprised. There are other perspectives on this hostility, 
        one from Ireland: Duffy, J. 'Backlash against the clergy inevitable', 
        The Irish Times, 14 September 1999, p. 13 Lynch mob attitudes have demonised priests 
        and nuns in recent years ... it is no mere media conspiracy; it reflects 
        genuine public anger. Power corrupts. In thousands of ways, some small 
        and trivial, some massive, the institutional church and its clergy have 
        hurt people who, because of its power and because it claimed to have God 
        on its side, felt powerless to defend themselves. Unchecked, the church 
        (sometimes) trampled upon those with whom its leaders disagreed, leaving 
        a legacy of hidden but bitter resentment that was guaranteed to come to 
        the surface. There was so much arrogance among churchmen in the past.   
       'If the sexual abuse allegations, charges and 
      convictions tell us something about the church, it is the lack of confident 
      fellowship among its members. Facing the loneliness of upholding a way of 
      life no longer the visionary ideal in society-at-large, the clergy are now 
      targets...they are identified by many Australians as untrustworthy. It matters 
      little that others have failed and many professions are as culpable. What 
      the wide revulsion towards the clergy indicates more is disappointment in 
      an ideal. Even if the faith which motivates such vocations is now discounted, 
      the expectation remains that ministers of a given faith will live up to 
      their beliefs.
  
        - Murray, J. 'When old assumptions break 
          down', The Australasian Catholic Record, Vol. LXXVI, No. 
          1, January 1999, p. 38. In the United States, Mr.A.R.W.Sipe, possessed 
        of formidable qualifications has conducted an on-going thirty to thirty-five 
        year study of the state of the American Catholic clergy to their vows 
        of celibacy. His work appears authentic: a large sample: 1500 subjects; 
        a long period of observation: 30 to 35 years. He asserts, without apparent 
        fear of contradiction, that 5% to 7% of US priests have molested children; 
        20% are, or have been in, sexual relationships with adult women, and 12% 
        - 15% have had gay sex. His input into the celebrated civil action against 
        the Archdiocese of Dallas (Texas) by the victims of Father Rudolph Kos 
        appears among the appendices to this article.   
       No comparable studies exist for English-speaking 
      countries such as Ireland, the British Isles, Australia or Canada. Impressionistic 
      and anecdotal evidence suggests that Sipe's research is broadly not precisely 
      relevant to the state of the church in these countries on this matter.
 In June 1997, in Canberra (Australia), the 
        executive of the Eros Foundation, the sex workers trade union, 
        called for a full public enquiry into the selection and training of Roman 
        Catholic priests. The Eros Foundation noted that in recent years, one-third 
        of all those convicted in Australia for sexual crimes against children 
        were Christian priests or ministers, most of them Roman Catholic. The 
        Eros Foundation stressed than none of its male or female members was a 
        convicted sex offender; the Eros Foundation added that it would not tolerate 
        convicted child molesters among its members. It is a case of 'Mary Magdalen' 
        laying down the law to the 'Pharisees'.   
       In all of this, certain assumptions are 
      being made:
  
        The actions of priests and church workers 
          are judged through a narrow prism; much is expected of them; Sexual networks and the more amorphous 
          sexual underworlds have exited in (some) dioceses and religious orders; A few decisively bad actions will undo 
          much good - by the individual and by his organisation; In due course, in a more educated, and 
          media-hungry world, the misdeeds of religious men will be exposed; This gives scandal in its strict meaning 
          of leading people away from God; some people faced with clerical shortcomings 
          find it hard to separate the man from the God he serves, or should be 
          serving; There has been a sense that some religious 
          leaders, vocal on all manner of issues, strict and decisive, are strangely 
          unwilling to discipline offenders in spite of the exceptional pressure 
          to do so; At a certain stage of infidelity, withdrawal 
          from the active ministry, or dismissal from it, is preferable to the 
          scandal of church officers trumpeting moral values publicly, while not 
          practising them privately. There must be an end to the 'Looking-Glass 
        world' where simple but unpalatable truths are wished away - 'He was a 
        little foolish'. (The famous comment of a Provincial one of whose men 
        was sentenced to six years imprisonment for sundry sex offences). 
 |